Highlights of this report…
1. Two more states may file BRAC suit
2. Zambia nabs British suspect
3. NYT defends Iran’s president-elect
4. Small diameter bomb
5. Russia’s “global control system”
6. Hugo loves Fidel
7. IRA statistics
8. China’s strategic nukes
9. Oilver Stone does 9/11
Here’s what’s happening…
Delaware and Massachusetts may follow Pennsylvania’s lead and sue the federal government over BRAC.
Officials in Zambia have arrested a man who the British believe played an instrumental role in the 7/7 London bombings. Interestingly, Haroon, Rashid Aswat use to be Osama Bin Ladin’s personal bodyguard.
ADV: Pollution Prevention? We have the solutions for your problems: Tanker
Trucks, Rail Tankers, ASTs, Totes, Drums, and Pails, so give us a call at
(800) 325-7421, or visit us at, www.containmentcorp.com
The New York Times and San Jose Mercury News have come to the defense of Iran’s new president elect, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. After his election, some of the Americans who had been taken hostage at the embassy in 1979 said that Ahmadinejad was one of the student radicals who participated in the takeover. According to the Times article posted on today’s Mercury News website, officials have concluded that photos of Ahmadinejad at the embassy are not consistent with his modern day appearance. That said, he is not innocent. From the article:
No proof Iranian leader took U.S. captives in 1979
New York Times
WASHINGTON – A month after some former American hostages in the U.S. Embassy in Tehran asserted that the president-elect of Iran was among their captors in 1979, government officials say they have turned up no evidence to support that claim.
Detailed analyses by the CIA comparing photos from 1979 of an Iranian captor who resembles the president-elect, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, with recent pictures of Ahmadinejad clearly showed that the photos were of two different men, the officials said.
“There were some very serious differences,” one official said.
The White House released a statement Thursday saying, “Mr. Ahmadinejad was a leader of the student movement that organized the attack on the embassy and the taking of American hostages.” But the statement added that the government still did not know whether he “explicitly was one of the hostage takers.”
Iranian militants seized the embassy in Tehran on Nov. 4, 1979, and held 52 Americans hostage for 444 days. Ahmadinejad has denied accusations that he took part. “It’s not true,” he said early this month. “It’s only rumors.”
Two things about this story are troubling. The reports about Ahmadinejad’s connection with the embassy takeover first came out on blogs and in media interviews with former hostages. Today’s NYT’s article suggests that it was the White House who made the connection. Wrong.
Secondly, the Times headline ignores his leadership role in the radical student movement. By telling readers that there is “No Proof Iranian Leader Took U.S. Captives,” it implies no connection. But even if he was not present at the actual invasion of the embassy, does that absolve him from any responsibility? As a leader of the movement, isn’t he even more culpable than the rank and file soldier? If the Times’ logic were to hold true, we would have to conclude that, because he wasn’t on the airplanes, Osama Bin Ladin should not be held responsible for 9/11. Wrong.
The Air Force small diameter bomb is making progress.
Russia has no plans to abandon islands that it seized from Japan after World War Two.
Russia does plan, however, to include the Caspian and Barents Seas in its “global control system.”
Hugo the Magnificent in Venezuela and Fidel Castro are meddling in Boliva’s internal affairs.
Since 1970, the Irish Republican Army has killed 1,775 people. Newsday has several more interesting stats.
Bill Gertz has an interesting piece on China’s plans for its strategic nuclear weapons.
And Finally…
Oliver Stone is preparing to film a movie about 9/11 where he will characterize the Bush Administration as being overzealous and too willing to abuse its power. According to one story:
Controversial director OLIVER STONE has hit out at US President GEORGE W BUSH for “misusing” his powers after the terrorist attacks on September 11th.
The NATURAL BORN KILLERS filmmaker, who is currently preparing the first major Hollywood movie to deal with the 2001 atrocities, believes Bush is the wrong man to lead America at the moment, and he is particularly angry about the US invasion of Iraq.
Stone says, “There was an over-reaction after 9/11. Bush was given enormous powers and misused them. He created a war in Iraq that has further helped bust the economy, and has led to civil war there.
“He was the wrong leader at the wrong time. I always felt that. I wish I was wrong.”
Stone also believes that his pathetic film on Alexander the Great, which portrays Alexander as a conflicted homosexual, was panned because too many people have a poor understanding of ancient history. Stone told reporters:
He says, “Because of BRAVEHEART, I think kids see ancient times as, ‘Hey man, that’s violence!’ They don’t see it as separate cultures that in some cases had stronger values than ours.
“The Greek culture in its entirety is what I was going for, or the Persian culture. It’s not just a hero’s tale. Alexander was a flawed hero, a complex character.
The sad thing about Oliver Stone is that he actually believes his movies, which often include “historical facts” that are completely fabricated, as realistic representations of past events. By most accounts, JFK, Alexander, and his movie on the Nixon White House were warped and flawed. I cannot wait to see what he does with 9/11.
I wonder if Michael Moron will be involved?